Thursday, February 25, 2010

Week #4—The Birth of Blaxploitation and the Emerging Presence of Blacks in Hollywood

Similar to the beginnings of an early African-American cinema in the 1910s and 1920s, the emergence of an African cinema in the late ‘50s and early ‘60s grew out of a population’s desire to tell their own stories. Early African filmmakers who were able learn how to use cinematic technology, particularly from Francophone West Africa, looked to traditions of oral storytelling from their respective countries as a source for the kinds of projects they wanted to make. Filmmakers also were compelled to comment on the current transitions within many African countries, in which they were obtaining liberation from European colonial rule. Both of these sources inform the three kinds of film genres associated with African cinema. One genre is the semi-documentary film, in which colonialism is depicted in a way that focuses on how residents of colonized countries overcome colonial rule. Another genre is the didactic/fictional film, in which the colonial relationship between European and African countries is depicted in a Manichean manner, primarily good vs. evil, or, more directly, over-resourced European nations and under-resourced African nations. The African nations, or characters, are depicted as returning to their indigenous roots as a way to solve their problems. The research film is another genre out of African cinema that is more focused on identifying the root causes to problems throughout African countries, and developing solutions that can confront these adversities. Research films are more so determined by depicting changes that could have a tremendous impact on how African countries could be depicted.

Ousmane Sembene’s "Black Girl (La Noire de…)", released in 1966, would be classified as a didactic-fictional film because he directly confronts the topic of colonial relations between Senegal and France. Through the relationship between a Senegalese domestic, Diouana, and the French couple that hires her, Sembene points to the distinct contrast between the vicarious fascination that Western popular culture prompts, and the position in which African citizens are truly shown. This contrast is further illustrated through how France is depicted in the magazines shown in Diouana’s flashbacks to Senegal, and the glimpse out of the window in the apartment where she works. Instead of the urban environment she imagines, Diouana is surrounded by white walls and captured in tight spaces. Sembene also incorporates traditions of griot storytelling, in that he uses the film to reflect contemporary issues and situations that residents of Senegal face, which largely explains why his characters represent more or less social types so that he can make effective social commentaries on colonial relations and interactions within Senegalese society itself along the lines of class and religion.

African filmmakers joined with organizations such as FEPACI as far back as the late ‘60s so that they would be able to participate, and ultimately control, the infrastructure of film production, distribution, and exhibition within continental Africa. Many of these filmmakers could not get their films shown in their native countries because organizations from outside of the continent controlled the block-booking system, which determined what kinds of films would be shown in theaters. SECMA and COMACICO felt that works by African filmmakers would detract from the profits they earned from showing movies from Europe and the United States. Resources for distribution (CIDC), production (CIPROFILM), and exhibition (film festivals such as FESPACO in Burkina Faso and Festival Panafricain de la Culture in Algiers) would be gained over the next day, until adjustments had to be made to challenge government censorship and identify other sources of funding.

The control over resources for production, distribution, and exhibition, in addition to representation, continued to be a struggle for African-American filmmakers well into the late ‘60s and early ‘70s. Melvin Van Peebles’s "Sweet Sweetback’s Baadasssss Song" (1971) was an effort to take initiative on all of those fronts, as he wrote, produced, scored, directed, and starred in the film with no studio funding or distribution. His film was designed to embody the rhetoric of the Black Power and Black Arts movements, in which the artistic production and sociopolitical activity reflected a movement towards self-determination and self-identity without the concerns of dominant White American society. The film addressed the notion of domestic colonialism, largely reflected through Sweetback’s role as a sex laborer who runs for his life after he beats two detectives unconsciously to save the life of a local revolutionary. Van Peebles also sought to disrupt the desexualized representations of Black men onscreen at that moment (i.e. Sidney Poitier), which explains the aggressive sexual content throughout. Some of the more sensationalist conventions from "Sweetback" would be appropriated by Hollywood studios that saw the money that Van Peebles’ film had made, and they wanted to replicate similar box office returns, given that mainstream movies at this time were losing money. It is important to think this week how about how an independently made film would give way to a new genre of studio-sponsored action films that starred Black characters, which would become know as blaxploitation.

4 comments:

  1. I must say that, though I was expecting the level of graphic nudity that the film was going to bring, I was caught a bit off-guard by the child Sweetback's introduction to "manhood" in the beginning clip of Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song. I've never really seen a film that started off on that kind of note! Given the context that the film was trying to establish, it makes complete sense, and nonetheless it definitely caught my attention.

    With regards to how Melvin Van Peebles had an impact on both American cinema and African American culture, the impact can be both shocking and obvious, depending from which end you approach the question. Van Peebles, in the documentary we watched in class, said it himself: everyone enjoys sex, so I'll put sex in my film. The overt sexuality presented in Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song kicked off the Blaxploitation genre by doing just that: casting many African American actors and actresses in sexually charged, "Man-fighting" heros and heroines. This brought African Americans to the theaters and raised amounts of money that I was admittedly shocked to hear! With that kind of income, no wonder films from that genre were so numerous and successful.

    I found it interesting that the NAACP actually coined the term Blaxploitation, and almost immediately following that term and the discussion that it sparked many African American actors and actresses were out of jobs! It really makes me wonder at the power of words: when that term was coined, what was the desired outcome? Did the NAACP wish for this, or did they just want to raise awareness to the issue that was facing African American culture in general? I'm not sure, as the issue is vast and I'm not a student in that field, but the question still intrigues me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Baadasssss Cinema is a very intriguing introduction to a movie genre called blaxploitation that was merged in the early 1970s. By watching excerpts of blaxploitation films and listening to director, critics’ ideas, I developed interests in these films.

    Sweet Sweetback’s Baadasssss Song was considered the first blaxploitation films, although there were different opinions. It has all the elements that blaxploitation movies have. Those films usually depict characters such as pimps, hit men and drug dealers and their lives. The stories mostly happen in ghetto areas. Black actors starred in the movies and target audiences are mainly African-Americans. In fact, they enjoyed a large popularity in Afrincan-Americans. These characters would usually experience some adventures that are involved in violence. What they go through in the movies are those audiences want to do but no way to achieve in their actual lives. This could be one of the reasons of their popularity. Besides that, just like director Melvin Van Peeble said, he would make his character appealed to audiences. In his Sweet Sweetback’s Baadasssss Song, the protagonist is a prostitute. So the specific characters and their lives on the screen could be one of the reasons that audiences enjoy these movies as well. The music score that were usually funk and soul jazz in these films made them became more appealing to audiences. They were written by acclaimed musicians and were very stylistic.

    However, because blaxploitation movies deal with the characters that often engage in criminal activities and violence, they attract widely racial controversies from social activists. They concerned about the negative influence that the stereotyping characters and their life style would bring to the society. But some of the actors and directors argue that blaxploitation movies getting made actually provided job opportunities for many African-Americans and profits for Hollywood studios.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While I don't necessarily agree with teh weight of political "message" some may put in Sweetback, I always respect Van Peebles method of breaking walls in the economic arena of film as well as reflecting a portion of truth in society. Amazingly, this is not the truth say, the NAACP would like, or another organization fighting for reflection of a positive and more "civilized" nature (i.e.; reflective of a set moralistic code, eurocentric or not. Nonetheless, it is a truth-gritty and hard, and a part of the American story of a hero for one particular demographic.

    It is in this nature I am moved, and the literature of the Black Arts Movement, in a way, is a mirror to this type of film (or vice versa). It is to establish ultra-manhood for a people not able atthe time to flex their full muscle in said humanity. It is a celebration of sexual honesty and intrigue, no matter how graphic. It is too easy to switch it up, and point the finger as "barbaric" an dbacking stereotypical depictions of Blacks. I pose this: White America came up with names, and characatures for Black America. TYPICALLY, it has revolved where Black America takes it, changes it-even sometimes adopting it-and then makes it illegitimate. I feel Van Peebles does this to the "brute", and makes him a hero for a segment of Black MAerica, right, wrogn or indifferent.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Keywords: exploitation, ghetto, segregation in film industry, guerrilla

    Questions:
    1. What did other audiences besides African-American think about Sweet Sweetback’s Baadasssss Song at the time when it was released?

    2. Why are blaxploitation films so powerful in terms of visual aspects?

    ReplyDelete